skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Question about lung cancer screening decision answered
![](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_uNhfoTPhRTCOiqE7SsSe-qOeBUUmoQp3YlyBkU-_zBgEg-Or6ykLXjQNo6dJl8Bf9xgqTodaWtOROLx07GbOuDbE-x-PUCj4lqgDjH1a4zPEaCLdHKobmzfFJ4AoTPwdG4TnmiXHjG5p8FhDk52qnJ3-QRCg9x-lg7kk5ON5O4_2IdHz0Z3LbIxC77eVwzCT_suZErqhsduNA=s0-d) |
Joshua Roth, PhD, MHA |
CANCER DIGEST – May 14, 2014 – Two weeks ago lung cancer experts were left with more questions than answers when a Medicare advisory panel recommended against using CT scanning for lung cancer screening, citing not enough evidence. That ran contrary to evidence of a large study showing such screening resulted in a 20 percent reduction in lung cancer deaths for people at high risk of the disease. Today a mathematical model of the screening program pegged the increased cost to Medicare at $9.3 billion over the next five years with approximately $5.6 billion
more spent on low-dose CT imaging, $1.1 billion for diagnostic workups,
and $2.6 billion more in cancer care expenditures.The study led by Dr. Joshua Roth of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, was summarized in a press release ahead of presentation at the upcoming American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting in Chicago at the end of May.
No comments:
Post a Comment